A Book, a Chapter. In the Dialogue Between the Church and the Jews, the “Land of Israel” Is No Longer Taboo

The six­tieth anni­ver­sa­ry of the con­ci­liar decla­ra­tion “Nostra Aetate,” on the rela­tion­ship with other reli­gions but abo­ve all with Judaism, pro­mul­ga­ted on October 28, 1965, had one effect. It mar­ked a resump­tion of dia­lo­gue bet­ween the Church and the Jews, which in recent times had regi­ste­red “misun­der­stan­dings, dif­fi­cul­ties and con­flic­ts,” aggra­va­ted by “poli­ti­cal cir­cum­stan­ces and the inju­sti­ces of some,” as Pope Leo XIV ack­no­w­led­ged in cele­bra­ting the event.

In effect, “Nostra Aetate” mar­ked a tur­ning point in the millennia-long histo­ry of the rela­tion­ship bet­ween Christians and Jews. The Catholic Church reco­gni­zed that “God holds the Jews most dear for the sake of their Fathers ; He does not repent of the gif­ts He makes or of the calls He issues,” and that the­re­fo­re it too, the Church, “dra­ws suste­nan­ce from the root of that well-cultivated oli­ve tree onto which have been graf­ted the wild shoo­ts,” whe­re the good stock is the Jews and the wild graft is all the other peo­ples that reco­gni­ze Jesus as the Messiah, as the Apostle Paul affir­med in his let­ter to the Romans.

But in recent years the dia­lo­gue bet­ween the two “oli­ve trees” had effec­ti­ve­ly dried up, as ack­no­w­led­ged repea­ted­ly by both sides, among others by the chief rab­bi of Rome, Riccardo Di Segni, in a recent book cove­red by Settimo Cielo.

To start again, Pope Leo has wan­ted to clean­se the Church at lea­st of the pri­me aver­sion still expres­sed from many sides again­st the Jews. He cited “Nostra Aetate,” whe­re it is writ­ten that the Church, “min­d­ful of the patri­mo­ny she shares with the Jews and moved not by poli­ti­cal rea­sons but by the Gospel’s spi­ri­tual love, decries hatred, per­se­cu­tions, displays of anti-Semitism, direc­ted again­st Jews at any time and by anyo­ne.” He added : “Since then, all my pre­de­ces­sors have con­dem­ned anti-Semitism with clear words. And so I too con­firm that the Church does not tole­ra­te anti-Semitism and fights again­st it, on the basis of the Gospel itself.”

And signs of a desi­re to revi­ve dia­lo­gue have also come from the Jewish side in recent days. One need only look at the par­ti­ci­pa­tion of many pro­mi­nent Jews in the even­ts held in Rome in com­me­mo­ra­tion of “Nostra Aetate,” with the acti­ve pre­sen­ce of the pope.

One of the­se even­ts, orga­ni­zed by the Community of Sant’Egidio, was held on October 28 at the Colosseum, with a warm exchan­ge of gree­tings bet­ween Leo and Rabbi Di Segni, and then with Rabbi David Rosen, direc­tor of the depart­ment of inter­re­li­gious affairs of the American Jewish Committee, and with Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt (see pho­to), pre­si­dent of the European rab­bis and for­mer chief rab­bi of Moscow, self-exiled from Russia in 2022 on account of its aggres­sion again­st Ukraine.

To be sure, one of the main cau­ses of dif­fi­cul­ty in the dia­lo­gue bet­ween the Church and the Jews is their dif­fe­rent inter­pre­ta­tion of the Scriptures, whe­re for Christians the Messiah Jesus is at the heart of eve­ry­thing, whi­le for Jews the cen­tral the­me is the pro­mi­se of the land to the descen­dan­ts of the patriar­chs. After “Nostra Aetate” it is no lon­ger so, but for cen­tu­ries the con­vic­tion of Christians had in fact been that the Jews could not return to their land until they reco­gni­zed the Messiah in Jesus, whom they had instead kil­led.

Hence the oppo­si­tion that the Catholic Church has long expres­sed to Zionism and the crea­tion of the State of Israel, which was accep­ted only in 1994 with the esta­blish­ment of diplo­ma­tic rela­tions with the Holy See, but always from a per­spec­ti­ve that has nothing reli­gious about it but refers to the com­mon prin­ci­ples of inter­na­tio­nal law.

The chief rab­bi of Milan, Alfonso Arbib, spea­king on October 31 at a demon­stra­tion in Rome again­st anti-Semitic hatred, also ack­no­w­led­ged that “the most com­plex issue” in the dia­lo­gue bet­ween the Church and Judaism remains “the rela­tion­ship with Israel and with the land of Israel.” If “rela­tions with the Vatican have long been so pro­ble­ma­tic, and in part still are,” it is pre­ci­se­ly becau­se “the indis­so­lu­ble bond bet­ween the Jewish peo­ple and their land is not ful­ly reco­gni­zed.”

Today no one demands that both sides agree in their inter­pre­ta­tion of the Scriptures, but Jews cer­tain­ly expect the Church to reco­gni­ze their essen­tial bond, reli­gious too, with the land offe­red to Israel by God.

And it is pre­ci­se­ly this bond that the text repro­du­ced below descri­bes.

The text is one of the six­teen chap­ters of “An Introduction to Judaism,” publi­shed this year in Italian and English throu­gh a joint ini­tia­ti­ve of the Italian epi­sco­pal con­fe­ren­ce and the Union of Italian Jewish Communities.

The book that con­tains the six­teen chap­ters – the full text of which is acces­si­ble for free onli­ne – is pri­ma­ri­ly inten­ded for schools, to pro­mo­te “cul­tu­re and kno­w­led­ge as a true anti­do­te to all forms of anti-Semitism.” And it is espe­cial­ly time­ly at a moment like the pre­sent, when the war in Gaza fol­lo­wing the pogrom car­ried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023, has infla­med the minds of many young peo­ple pre­ci­se­ly again­st Jews.

On November 5 the Italian embas­sy to the Holy See will host a pre­sen­ta­tion of the book, with remarks from both the pre­si­dent of the epi­sco­pal con­fe­ren­ce, Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, and the pre­si­dent of the Union of Italian Jewish Communities, Noemi Di Segni.

These are the titles of each chap­ter :

1. The Hebrew Bible

2. The writ­ten Torah and the oral Torah

3. The name of God

4. The elec­tion of Israel

5. Justice and mer­cy

6. Precepts and values

7. The Jewish calen­dar and the cycle of holi­days

8. The cycle of life

9. Priests, Rabbis and… Kohamin Priests

10. Women in Judaism

11. The peo­ple of Israel and the land of Israel

12. Jesus/Yeshua the Jew

13. Paul/Shaul the Jew

14. A brief histo­ry of Italian Jews

15. Jewish-Christian dia­lo­gue sin­ce the second Vatican Council

16. Description of the accu­ra­te mea­ning of cer­tain terms

And so here is what the ele­venth chap­ter says.

*

THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL AND THE LAND OF ISRAEL

 

“Eretz Yisrael,” the Land of Israel, has been at the cen­tre of the dreams and aspi­ra­tions of the Jewish peo­ple sin­ce bibli­cal times. The Lord said to Abraham : “Go forth from your land, and from your bir­th­pla­ce, and from your father’s hou­se, to the land that I will show you” (Genesis 12:1). And it was the­re that Abraham wan­de­red, dig­ging wells, ten­ding his flocks and beha­ving with justi­ce towards all. It is also the land that God pro­mi­sed to Abraham’s descen­dan­ts, who retur­ned the­re after a long period of exi­le and sla­ve­ry.

The Torah refers to the Land of Israel as the Land of Canaan, spe­ci­fi­cal­ly the ter­ri­to­ry west of the Jordan River. In con­tra­st, the area east of the Jordan River is usual­ly refer­red to in the Torah as the land of Gilead.

The land of Canaan is the object of the pro­mi­se made by the Lord to the patriar­chs : “I assi­gn the land you sojourn in to you and your off­spring to come, all the land of Canaan, as an ever­la­sting hol­ding. I will be their God.” (Genesis 17:8). In other pas­sa­ges of the Torah, the land of Israel is refer­red to as “the land” without fur­ther attri­bu­tion, to be under­stood as a spe­cial land.

In the pro­phe­tic books, in addi­tion to the land of Canaan, we often find the term “Land of Israel”, which is to beco­me pre­va­lent in con­junc­tion with the term ‘Land’ adop­ted by the sages of the rab­bi­nic tra­di­tion, as oppo­sed to the other lands refer­red to as “Huṣ La-Haaretz” (outsi­de the land) or “Eretz Ha’ammim” (land of the peo­ples). Sometimes the Divine Voice calls it “My Land.”

Another tra­di­tio­nal term for Israel is “Eretz Hemdah” (land of desi­re), indi­ca­ting that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob lon­ged for this land, to the extent that Abraham pur­cha­sed the Cave of Machpelah as a burial pla­ce for his wife Sarah, the Lord pre­ven­ted Isaac from lea­ving Israel, and Jacob asked not to be buried in Egypt but in the Land of Israel.

Rarely does the Bible use the term “Holy Land.” Nonetheless, the Land is seen as a gift of God to Israel. God wat­ches over this land and what hap­pens in it in a spe­cial way (Deut 11:12). In fact, the Land belongs exclu­si­ve­ly to the Lord, and its enjoy­ment is sub­ject to obe­dien­ce to His laws. The gift given to Israel is not gra­tui­tous : three good gif­ts were besto­wed on Israel by God and all three were given after suf­fe­ring. The three are Torah, the Land of Israel and the life to come. (Berakhot 5a).

The cen­tra­li­ty of “Eretz Yisrael” has tra­di­tio­nal­ly been the most impor­tant ele­ment of Jewish wor­ship and con­sciou­sness. When pray­ing, Jews turn towards Land of Israel, and in par­ti­cu­lar towards Jerusalem and toward the site of the ancient Temple. This con­nec­tion is cul­ti­va­ted throu­gh the obser­van­ce of reli­gious festi­vals, almo­st all of which are lin­ked to the agri­cul­tu­ral sea­sons of the Land of Israel, and throu­gh the stu­dy of the laws gover­ning the sacred use of the land.

This strong spi­ri­tual and phy­si­cal bond forms part of an ideal col­lec­ti­ve iden­ti­ty. The hope of retur­ning to the Land is the the­me of dai­ly prayers, along with an immen­se litur­gi­cal and mysti­cal lite­ra­tu­re, as well as various pre­cep­ts not exclu­si­ve­ly rela­ted to agri­cul­tu­ral life. The appli­ca­tion of cri­mi­nal law, for exam­ple, can­not be prac­ti­sed outsi­de Israel, and even in Israel some pre­cep­ts requi­re a num­ber of pre­con­di­tions, such as the sove­rei­gn­ty of the enti­re Jewish peo­ple in their own land.

The rela­tion­ship bet­ween land, peo­ple and Torah has played a cru­cial role in all Jewish com­mu­ni­ties throu­ghout histo­ry, and the lon­ging for the lost home­land has dri­ven Jews on the path of Return. In the days when the fir­st waves of immi­gra­tion arri­ved in Palestine as a result of poli­ti­cal Zionism, Jewish com­mu­ni­ties alrea­dy exi­sted in the ancient holy cities of Jerusalem, Tiberias, Safed and Chevron.

The ancient “Yishuv,” i.e. the com­mu­ni­ty that exi­sted befo­re the more recent influ­xes, was extre­me­ly poor. It was an ortho­dox com­mu­ni­ty that lived off the cha­ri­ty of Jewish com­mu­ni­ties in the Diaspora. It testi­fies to the con­ti­nui­ty of the Jewish pre­sen­ce in Palestine and is an expres­sion of reli­gious zeal, of the hope of the Return of the Jewish peo­ple to Israel, the waves of mes­sia­nic enthu­sia­sm that saw their aspi­ra­tions tran­sfor­med into a poli­ti­cal rea­li­ty with the Jewish natio­nal move­ment cal­led Zionism.

Zionism is the move­ment for the poli­ti­cal self-determination of the Jewish peo­ple, which led to the crea­tion of the State of Israel in 1948. Criticising the Israeli govern­ment for a deci­sion it has taken does not amount to being anti-Zionist, but refu­sing to reco­gni­se the right of the Jewish peo­ple to their own natio­n­hood cer­tain­ly does.

Before the birth of the State of Israel, the­re were Zionist Jews and anti-Zionist Jews ; the­re was a legi­ti­ma­te choi­ce. To be anti-Zionist today is to sup­port the destruc­tion of a sta­te, albeit not a per­fect one, but a demo­cra­tic one, with nine mil­lion citi­zens.

Church autho­ri­ties were lar­ge­ly again­st Zionism and oppo­sed the crea­tion of the State of Israel, ini­tial­ly for reli­gious rea­sons lin­ked to the non-recognition of Jesus as the Messiah. Since 1994, howe­ver, regu­lar diplo­ma­tic rela­tions have been esta­bli­shed bet­ween Israel and the Holy See, with the ope­ning of a nun­cia­tu­re in Israel and an Israeli embas­sy in Rome.

(Translated by Matthew Sherry : traduttore@​hotmail.​com)

— —  — —

Sandro Magister is past “vati­ca­ni­sta” of the Italian wee­kly L’Espresso.
The late­st arti­cles in English of his blog Settimo Cielo are on this page.
But the full archi­ve of Settimo Cielo in English, from 2017 to today, is acces­si­ble.
As is the com­ple­te index of the blog www.chiesa, which pre­ce­ded it.

Retour en haut