Jesus Is the Only One Who Saves, Says Leo. So Much For Equality Between Religions

A Church uni­ted on the essen­tial tru­ths of the Christian faith : this is what Pope Leo wan­ts, jud­ging by the actions and words of the start of his pon­ti­fi­ca­te.

And what truth is more fun­da­men­tal for Christianity than that which sees in Jesus the only savior of all men ?

Leo recal­led, in the sim­ple­st and clea­re­st words, this pri­mor­dial “creed” in the talk he gave on August 25 to a group of altar ser­vers who had come from France :

“Who will come to save us ? Not only from our suf­fe­rings, from our limi­ts and our mista­kes, but even from death itself ? The answer is per­fec­tly clear, and resounds in the History of 2000 years : only Jesus comes to save us, no-one else : becau­se only he has the power to do so – He is God Almighty in per­son – and becau­se he loves us. Saint Peter said it empha­ti­cal­ly : ‘There is sal­va­tion in no one else, for the­re is no other name under hea­ven given among men by which we must be saved’ (Acts 4:12). Never for­get the­se words, dear friends : imprint them on your heart, and pla­ce Jesus at the cen­tre of your lives.”

And yet, pre­ci­se­ly over this pil­lar of the Christian faith, a very insi­dious dispu­te was igni­ted in the Church a quar­ter of a cen­tu­ry ago, under the ban­ner of inter­re­li­gious dia­lo­gue and the equa­li­ty of paths to sal­va­tion. A dispu­te that then-pope John Paul II and his guar­dian angel of doc­tri­ne, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, sought to resol­ve with the decla­ra­tion “Dominus Iesus” of August 6, 2000, “on the uni­ci­ty and sal­vi­fic uni­ver­sa­li­ty of Jesus Christ and the Church.”

With the result of fue­ling the con­flict even more. "Dominus Iesus" was con­te­sted at all levels : pasto­ral, theo­lo­gi­cal, hie­rar­chi­cal. It was cri­ti­ci­zed by illu­strious car­di­nals like Walter Kasper, Edward Cassidy, Carlo Maria Martini.

Nor did the dispu­te set­tle down in the sub­se­quent years. So much so that in 2005, in the pre­con­cla­ve fol­lo­wing the death of John Paul II, Cardinal Giacomo Biffi felt it his duty to “bring to the atten­tion of the next pope” pre­ci­se­ly “the incre­di­ble inci­dent of 'Dominus Iesus'.” And he explai­ned the rea­son as fol­lo­ws :

“That Jesus is the only neces­sa­ry Savior of all is a truth that for over twen­ty cen­tu­ries – begin­ning with Peter’s discour­se after Pentecost – it was never felt neces­si­ty to resta­te. This truth is, so to speak, the mini­mum thre­shold of the faith ; it is the pri­mor­dial cer­ti­tu­de, it is among belie­vers the sim­ple and most essen­tial fact. In two thou­sand years this has never been brought into doubt, not even during the cri­sis of Arianism, and not even during the uphea­val of the Protestant Reformation. The fact of nee­ding to issue a remin­der of this in our time tells us the extent of the gra­vi­ty of the cur­rent situa­tion.”

The 2005 con­cla­ve elec­ted Benedict XVI, who had writ­ten and signed "Dominus Iesus." But even he was una­ble to quell the dispu­te. Still in 2014, two years after his resi­gna­tion from the papa­cy and in the rei­gn of Francis, many – to name one of the many, Church histo­rian Alberto Melloni – con­ti­nued to give cre­den­ce to the “fake news” accor­ding to which the docu­ment had been writ­ten by coar­se curial ste­no­gra­phers, rashly allo­wed to act by John Paul II and Ratzinger.

With Ratzinger, who instead repor­ted in wri­ting this incon­tro­ver­ti­ble back­ground, from the her­mi­ta­ge to which he had reti­red after his resi­gna­tion from the papa­cy :

“In the face of the fire­storm that had deve­lo­ped around ‘Dominus Iesus,’ John Paul II told me that he inten­ded to defend the docu­ment une­qui­vo­cal­ly at the Angelus [of Sunday, October1, 2000 – ed.]. He invi­ted me to wri­te a text for the Angelus that would be, so to speak, air­tight and not sub­ject to any dif­fe­rent inter­pre­ta­tion wha­tsoe­ver. It had to be com­ple­te­ly unmi­sta­ka­ble that he appro­ved the docu­ment uncon­di­tio­nal­ly. So I pre­pa­red a brief address : I did not intend, howe­ver, to be too bru­sque, and so I tried to express myself clear­ly but without har­sh­ness. After rea­ding it, the pope asked me once again : ‘Is it real­ly clear enou­gh?’ I replied that it was.”

With this par­ting com­ment, sub­tly iro­nic : “Those who know theo­lo­gians will not be sur­pri­sed that in spi­te of this the­re were after­ward some who main­tai­ned that the pope had pru­den­tly distan­ced him­self from that text.”

Nor with Pope Francis was the dispu­te paci­fied. Quite the oppo­si­te. He him­self kept it very much ali­ve, if one sim­ply rereads his ver­ba­tim remarks on the equa­li­ty of all reli­gions for the ends of sal­va­tion, on September 13, 2024, in Singapore :

“One of the things that has impres­sed me most about the young peo­ple here is your capa­ci­ty for inter­faith dia­lo­gue. This is very impor­tant becau­se if you start arguing, ‘My reli­gion is more impor­tant than yours…,’ or ‘Mine is the true one, yours is not true…,’ whe­re does this lead ? Somebody answer. [A young per­son answers, ‘Destruction.’] That is cor­rect. All reli­gions are paths to God. I will use an ana­lo­gy, they are like dif­fe­rent lan­gua­ges that express the divi­ne. But God is for eve­ryo­ne, and the­re­fo­re, we are all God’s chil­dren. ‘But my God is more impor­tant than yours!’ Is this true ? There is only one God, and reli­gions are like lan­gua­ges, paths to reach God. Some Sikh, some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian. Understood?”

With Francis, the miti­ga­tor was that no one took what he said lite­ral­ly any­mo­re, after years of his vague and con­tra­dic­to­ry words on the most dispa­ra­te topics.

But what about Leo ? Clarity of expres­sion is one of his undi­spu­ted gif­ts. And tho­se few, crystal-clear words he spo­ke on August 25 to the French altar ser­vers are a per­fect sum­ma­ry of the pri­mor­dial and foun­da­tio­nal truth of the Christian faith : the cer­tain­ty that “only Jesus comes to save us, no-one else.”

Leo did not cite "Dominus Iesus" in his sup­port. He did not men­tion how much it has been con­te­sted. But he indi­ca­ted the direc­tion that he wan­ts the Church to take on this deci­si­ve que­stion.

With a fur­ther, equal­ly vital instruc­tion. Because after the exhor­ta­tion to “imprint on your heart” Peter’s sta­te­ment about Jesus : “There is no other name under hea­ven given among men by which we must be saved,” he con­ti­nued :

“And the Church, from gene­ra­tion to gene­ra­tion, care­ful­ly con­ser­ves the memo­ry of the death and resur­rec­tion of the Lord of whom she is wit­ness, as her most pre­cious trea­su­re. She pre­ser­ves and tran­smi­ts it by cele­bra­ting the Eucharist, which you have the joy and honour of ser­ving. The Eucharist is the trea­su­re of the Church, the trea­su­re of trea­su­res. Ever sin­ce the very fir­st day of her exi­sten­ce, and then throu­ghout the cen­tu­ries, the Church has cele­bra­ted Mass, Sunday after Sunday, to remem­ber what the Lord has done for her. In the hands of the prie­st, and in his words ‘This is my Body, this is my Blood,’ Jesus once again gives his life on the altar, he once again sheds his blood for us. Dear altar ser­vers, the cele­bra­tion of Mass saves us today ! It saves the world today ! It is the most impor­tant event in the life of the Christian and in the life of the Church, becau­se it is the encoun­ter in which God gives him­self to us for love, again and again. Christians do not go to Mass out of duty, but becau­se they abso­lu­te­ly need to ; the need for the life of God who gives him­self without asking for any­thing in return!”

Jesus, sole savior of all, and the Eucharist. Faith and the sacra­ment. Pope Leo sim­ply goes to the heart of Christianity, and it is the­re that he wan­ts to lead the Church, uni­ted in the essen­tial. “In illo uno unum,” says his mot­to, in the words of St. Augustine : uni­ted in Jesus, and in him alo­ne.

(Translated by Matthew Sherry : traduttore@​hotmail.​com)

— —  — —

Sandro Magister is past “vati­ca­ni­sta” of the Italian wee­kly L’Espresso.
The late­st arti­cles in English of his blog Settimo Cielo are on this page.
But the full archi­ve of Settimo Cielo in English, from 2017 to today, is acces­si­ble.
As is the com­ple­te index of the blog www.chiesa, which pre­ce­ded it.

Share Button
Retour en haut