A Readworthy New Journal of Theology. It’s Called “Fidei Communio”

It would be hard to give a new jour­nal of theo­lo­gy a name more in kee­ping with Pope Leo’s vision than this : “Fidei Communio.” Yet the jour­nal was con­cei­ved and born befo­re the elec­tion of Robert Francis Prevost to the chair of Peter. Its foun­ders were con­vin­ced that “if ‘com­mu­nion’ was the hori­zon of post-conciliar chal­len­ges, ‘faith’ under cri­sis is the urgent cur­rent hori­zon of eccle­sial thought.” Just as in the Augustinian mot­to of the cur­rent pope : “In Illo uno unum,” uni­ted in the one Christ.

Two sub­stan­tial issues of “Fidei Communio” have been publi­shed so far, on a bian­nual basis, by a distin­gui­shed Italian publi­sher, Nerbini, of Florence. But its sco­pe is inter­na­tio­nal, with all the arti­cles offe­red in their enti­re­ty and free on the web to rea­ders around the world.

Its birth, in 2025, came about exac­tly fif­ty years after the launch of ano­ther famous jour­nal of theo­lo­gy of near­ly the same name, “Communio,” foun­ded in 1975 by the talen­ted theo­lo­gians Hans Urs von Balthasar, Henri de Lubac, Joseph Ratzinger, and Louis Bouyer. Their intent was to offer the Church theo­lo­gi­cal reflec­tion in the wake of Vatican Council II, cor­rec­tly inter­pre­ted with a “her­me­neu­tic of reform, of renewal in the con­ti­nui­ty of the one subject-Church” – as Ratzinger him­self would say as pope – and not with the “her­me­neu­tic of discon­ti­nui­ty and rup­tu­re” advo­ca­ted instead by the pre­ce­ding and rival theo­lo­gi­cal jour­nal Concilium, still publi­shed in seve­ral lan­gua­ges.

Communio” also con­ti­nues to be publi­shed in a dozen coun­tries, but for ten years no lon­ger in Italy and Spain. And the new jour­nal has been brought to life pre­ci­se­ly by Italian and Spanish theo­lo­gians, among the most autho­ri­ta­ti­ve of the gene­ra­tions born after the foun­ding of the fore­run­ner jour­nal.

The direc­tor of £Fidei Communio” is Alessandro Clemenzia, of the Theological Faculty of Central Italy in Florence. The exe­cu­ti­ve board com­pri­ses two pro­fes­sors from the Saint Isidore of Seville Theological Faculty, Miguel Ángel Núñez Aguilera and Manuel Palma Ramírez ; Nicola Salato of the Pontifical Theological Faculty of Southern Italy, in Naples ; and Roberto Regoli, pro­fes­sor at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome.

It should be noted that Regoli, who is a talen­ted Church histo­rian, is not the only non-theologian who wri­tes for the maga­zi­ne, thou­gh he kno­ws qui­te a bit of theo­lo­gy, given how he was able to intert­wi­ne both of the­se capa­ci­ties in the most pro­found ana­ly­sis yet publi­shed on the pon­ti­fi­ca­te of Benedict XVI, relea­sed by Lindau in 2016 with the title : “Beyond the Crises in the Church.”

“Fidei Communio,” in fact, also means to pro­vi­de a plat­form for reli­gious stu­dies, means to bring other fields of kno­w­led­ge into dia­lo­gue with theo­lo­gy : phi­lo­so­phy, histo­ry, law, socio­lo­gy, poli­ti­cal scien­ce, lite­ra­tu­re, the arts.

For exam­ple, in the fir­st issue of “Fidei Communio” the socio­lo­gi­st Cecilia Costa of Roma Tre University and the phi­lo­so­pher Paul Gilbert of the Gregorian wri­te about Catholic reli­gio­si­ty in con­tem­po­ra­ry cul­tu­re and about arti­fi­cial intel­li­gen­ce, respec­ti­ve­ly. While the theo­lo­gian José Granados sets Christology along­si­de the anth­ro­po­lo­gy domi­nant today.

And this fir­st issue also fea­tu­res an exchan­ge, in a “Forum” on Ratzinger’s eccle­sio­lo­gi­cal wri­tings, bet­ween the magazine’s edi­tor and the histo­rians Regoli and Andrea Riccardi. With Regoli aiming straight at the major dispu­te that divi­des the Catholic Church today, bet­ween a demo­cra­tic mode of evo­lu­tion, com­ple­te with majo­ri­ty voting even on dog­mas of faith, and on the other hand the the­sis of Ratzinger – and of Regoli him­self – that “truth can­not be put to a vote,” nei­ther in a coun­cil, nor in a synod, nor much less in an epi­sco­pal con­fe­ren­ce.

That this lat­ter is a serious issue in the life of the Church today, aggra­va­ted by the drift of the German “syno­dal way,” is also clear­ly noted in the second issue of “Fidei Communio,” with an arti­cle by its direc­tor Clemenzia on “Synodality and Church Reform : Some Viewpoints in Dialogue with Joseph Ratzinger” and with a “Forum” bet­ween the theo­lo­gian Vito Impellizzeri and the illu­strious cano­ni­st Geraldina Boni on the alarm rai­sed by ano­ther great cano­ni­st, Carlo Fantappié, over the con­fu­sed pro­cess toward a “syno­dal Church” ini­tia­ted by Pope Francis.

But there’s ano­ther highly topi­cal the­me addres­sed in the second issue of “Fidei Communio.” It is the mea­ning of histo­ry, under­stood both as “Church histo­ry,” addres­sed by Regoli in an arti­cle with the see­min­gly para­do­xi­cal title “The Uselessness of Church History. Namely, Its Necessity,” and as “theo­lo­gy of histo­ry,” retra­ced by the French theo­lo­gian and “Communio” direc­tor Jean-Robert Armogathe in an arti­cle enti­tled “Of the Need for a Theology of History,” in which he gives an account of the mul­ti­ple rea­dings of the “myste­ry of histo­ry,” in an exi­sten­tial vein as in Rudolf Bultmann, in a Christological vein as in Oscar Cullmann, in an escha­to­lo­gi­cal vein as in Jean Daniélou, with the dia­lec­tic bet­ween the “alrea­dy” of the sal­va­tion brought by Christ and the “not yet” of its defi­ni­ti­ve ful­fill­ment, to con­clu­de that in any case “a theo­lo­gy of histo­ry is the neces­sa­ry con­di­tion of an authen­tic Christian theo­lo­gy”: an affir­ma­tion cer­tain­ly shared by Pope Leo, with his Augustinian vision of the coe­xi­sten­ce of the city of God and the ear­thly city.

They are all chal­len­ging topics, tho­se addres­sed in “Fidei Communio.” But it must be said that they are deli­be­ra­te­ly pre­sen­ted in clear form, also rea­da­ble for non-specialists, and at times even com­pel­ling. But always with impec­ca­ble scho­lar­ly accu­ra­cy, gua­ran­teed by the prior peer review of each arti­cle.

Nor should ano­ther con­cor­dan­ce be over­loo­ked bet­ween the birth of “Fidei Communio” and Pope Leo, who last January 7 began a new cycle of his Wednesday cate­che­ses, dedi­ca­ted pre­ci­se­ly to a rerea­ding of Vatican Council II throu­gh its docu­men­ts. That is, the true Council, not that of the media.

(On the cover, repro­du­ced abo­ve, of the fir­st issue of “Fidei Communio,” a detail of “St. Augustine in His Study,” attri­bu­ted to Caravaggio).

(Translated by Matthew Sherry : traduttore@​hotmail.​com)

— —  — —

Sandro Magister is past “vati­ca­ni­sta” of the Italian wee­kly L’Espresso.
The late­st arti­cles in English of his blog Settimo Cielo are on this page.
But the full archi­ve of Settimo Cielo in English, from 2017 to today, is acces­si­ble.
As is the com­ple­te index of the blog www.chiesa, which pre­ce­ded it.

Retour en haut